The Prime Minister’s declarations for free wi-fi connection come under
the mantle of “growth”, but we shouldn’t buy. Once free wi-fi is provided, the companies
which failed to win the tender will be swept from the market or grow
significantly weaker as the demand for their paid services will be minimal.The lack
of competition entails decreased investments and thus no technological progress
is expected. The winning company will be disincentivised to make large-scale
investments as a)there are no strong competitors to run behind b)there’s an increased
uncertainty regarding the continuation of their activity(cronyism,corruption,other
extra-market factors) which fuels predatory behavior.Furthemore,internet
provider’s contraparte will be the government, establishing a state’s
monopsony,which goes down to suboptimal outcomes for internet users: enterprises
in the free market spend large amounts of money so as to individualize the
preferences of the various costumer types.But when the state will stand for
millions of internet users,unavoidably the “average costumer’s needs” rationale
kicks in and the more demanding users among us won’t be able to find a product
that best suits their needs.For the aforementioned reasons,contrary to what
mr.Samaras holds,such a provision would impede “growth”,distort the market and
lower the quality standards of provided services.
Mariela Tiliakou
Mariela Tiliakou