Should the government control my bedroom?

There is no society (non totalitarian) which openly interferes with people's bedrooms.

Governments do not ask about individuals' sexual life.

One would now see two different paths:(path 1) Individuals have the right to their sexuality and individual life (right to a not controlled by government bedroom). (path 2) Individuals have the right to have common insurance, common loan or even a baby with other individuals. Path 1 is a path homosexuals can walk. Path 2 is a path homosexuals walk only when governments allow them.

If we now agree that no rational individual would enter a society in which they could not choose who to share their bedroom with and if we agree that such a society would be unjust, because of interfering with people's personalities trying to conform them, then we agree that walking on Path 1 if not combined with walking on Path 2 is like choosing to be deprived of rights.

So, if walkers of Path 1 are excluded from Path 2 one should choose Paths. Since both Paths lead to essential individual rights making one choose between 1 and 2 means making them choose which rights they prefer not to have.