There is an
argument in favor of free speech based on the importance of being
free to make a decision, having all the related information available
to you.
Consider a
society in which we decide, by vote or using the market
correspondingly, to whom political or financial power should be
assigned. Shouldn't we know what these competitive individuals like
or dislike, in order to choose? If, for example, I dislike X group of people,
being not allowed to say so means others will never know I hate X.
Shouldn't X and those supporting X's ideas know my
feelings?
In a free
market of ideas expression of hate speech leads in individuals, aware
of one's ideas, able to decide rationally who to empower with their
vote or money. If expression of sexist, racist or homophobic feelings
was forbidden, we would never actually know enough, in order to make
a political choice. A sexist might thus be voted to deal with woman's
issues. If “Barilla” was not allowed to express itself against
new forms of family, homosexuals' or one-parent families would be
deprived of the option not to put “Barilla” on their table.
Vivian
Stergiou
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου